[arin-ppml] ARIN 2019-13

[William Herrin]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:32 AM Chris Woodfield <chris at semihuman.com> wrote:

> One could argue that the enforceability of that revocation alone could be
> problematic if the non-domestic entity is able to get a local injunction in
> their home country against it. It is indeed questionable as to whether or
> not *that* injunction would be enforceable in the United States, but
> there’s always the risk of ARIN representatives being held liable should
> they travel to the issuing country. And don’t forget, ARIN staff, board,
> and AC members regularly travel to quite a number of foreign countries on
> official business (I’m typing this from RIPE79 in Rotterdam, for example…),
> so this risk may not be as theoretical as one would assume.
>

Hi Chris,

Sure, and if you're charged with murder in Japan while you're in Rotterdam
you best not show up at NRT. This feels like a reach to me. If it's a
credible risk, I'd like to understand more about what makes it credible.
>From a lawyer who can talk about examples of it happening and demonstrate
the connection to the example organization's willingness to intentionally
do business with a foreign entity.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20191017/ee33e33d/attachment.htm>