[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
Martin Hannigan
hannigan at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 18:21:40 EST 2019
This isn't a productive proposal. I’m not in favor of this approach.
Best,
-M<
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:56 ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> On 1 November 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
> "ARIN-prop-278: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers"
> as a Draft Policy.
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19 is below and can be found at:
>
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_19/
>
> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft
> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as
> stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these
> principles are:
>
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
>
> The PDP can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
>
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
>
> Regards,
>
> Sean Hopkins
> Policy Analyst
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4
> Transfers
>
> Problem Statement:
>
> On 7 May 2007 the ARIN Board unanimously passed an IPv6 resolution. In
> 2011, the last /8 blocks were assigned to the RIR’s and has now been
> over 4 years since the IPv4 free pool was exhausted at ARIN.
>
> Now is the time for ARIN to require those who receive transferred IPv4
> space to have in place an operational IPv6 network.
>
> Policy statement:
>
> In section 8.5.2, add the following language to the end of the paragraph
> entitled “Operational Use”:
>
> Such operational network must at minimum include an allocation or
> assignment by ARIN of IPv6 address space under the same Org ID receiving
> the transferred IPv4 space. Such Org must be able to prove this IPv6
> space is being routed by using it to communicate with ARIN.
>
> In the event the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
>
> Timetable for Implementation: Upon Passage
>
> Anything Else:
>
> The following was included in the IPv6 resolution:
>
> BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of Trustees hereby requests the ARIN
> Advisory Council to consider Internet Numbering Resource Policy changes
> advisable to encourage migration to IPv6 numbering resources where
> possible.
>
> This proposal is part of an effort to encourage migration to IPv6.
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20191106/7b72c54e/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list