[arin-ppml] Waiting List IPv4 blocks transferred after issuance

Wed May 29 10:52:22 EDT 2019

I support either of these restrictions. A /21, /20, /19 for current
waitlist....

I support a /22 restriction for new entrants, a /19 max for current list
members, and maintenance of the 12 month wait for simplicity’s sake.

What about discuss /22 for new entrants, /20 for current list members and
36, 42 or 48 months for transfers ? Seems more reasonable in my view and
cover most aspects of this discussion.

------------------------------

*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Free Call: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
Michael.Williams at glexia.com
https://www.glexia.com/
https://www.glexia.com.au/

*Legal Notice:*
The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by
anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:50 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 29/05/2019 11:31, Mike Burns wrote:
>
> Orgs will wait out any period, sitting with unused addresses until they
> reach the resale date. Not efficient use.
>
> If it's not a legacy resource and if ARIN gets to know about it, it may
> just recover this addresses even if the resource holder is paying it
> correctly. That's how it should work.
>
>
> People will lease unused addresses to others and Whois accuracy will
> suffer if they can’t resell them. Not accurate registration.
>
> If people lease they prove they have no use for the addresses and again
> ARIN should recover them at any time. If whois is inaccurate, well it is
> their fault and not policies fault. They must bind to the current rules not
> the other way round.
>
>
> I think we should give everybody currently on the list up to a /19 and
> then restrict new entries to a /22.
>
> Fair to discuss this scenario, although I still think /19 is too much.
> Agree on /22 for new entries.
>
> I think a 5 year resale wait is too long, based on the paltry resales of
> prior waiting-list subnets smaller than /19.
>
> It may be long, but 2 years seems a little short and 'acceptable' for a
> fraudster. Perhaps something in between.
>
> I support a /22 restriction for new entrants, a /19 max for current list
> members, and maintenance of the 12 month wait for simplicity’s sake.
>
> What about discuss /22 for new entrants, /20 for current list members and
> 36, 42 or 48 months for transfers ? Seems more reasonable in my view and
> cover most aspects of this discussion.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net>
> <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> *On Behalf Of *Fernando Frediani
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 29, 2019 8:51 AM
> *To:* arin-ppml at arin.net
> *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Waiting List IPv4 blocks transferred after
> issuance
>
>
>
> +1
>
> On 28/05/2019 23:52, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
>
>
> Yes and no. I believe that the lack of legacy holders for any blocks
> issued under 4.1.8 reduces the need for the market.
>
>
>
> Defunct organizations can easily be reclaimed in this space because they
> stop paying their ARIN bill.
>
>
>
> Eliminating the resale value of these addresses won’t really encourage
> squatting on them and limiting the size of organization and size of block
> that can benefit from 4.1.8 further helps to reduce the potential for
> hoarding.
>
>
>
> I realize that as a broker, any address that can’t be monetized is a lost
> opportunity for your organization, but I think there’s plenty of addresses
> out there that haven’t been processed through 4.1.8, so I don’t think
> limiting the resale potential of such blocks to reduce fraud is a bad idea.
>
>
>
> Owen
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 28, 2019, at 12:46 , Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The percentages of blocks transferred takes a significant leap at the /19
> size.
>
> Below that, the percentages are all below 7%.
>
> At /19 and above, the percentages are all above 21%.
>
> Seems like a natural demarcation for maximum block size, but prices do
> continue to rise.
>
> While we want to fight fraud, we should still remember the underlying
> reasons for the Ipv4 transfer market apply to these addresses as well.
>
> That is, the market provides incentives for efficient use and accurate
> registration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> *On Behalf Of *John Curran
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 1:53 PM
> *To:* ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml at arin.net>
> *Subject:* [arin-ppml] Waiting List IPv4 blocks transferred after issuance
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Folks -
>
>
>
> It occurred to me that it might be useful to have a quick summary of
> waiting list blocks issued and subsequently transferred.
>
>
>
> Attached is the distribution (count per prefix size) of all blocks that
> have been issued via ARIN's waiting list policy and subsequently
> transferred via NRPM 8.2/8.3/8.4 policy.
>
>
>
> FYI,
>
> /John
>
>
>
> John Curran
>
> President and CEO
>
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <image001.png>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ARIN-PPML
>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20190529/995f69a4/attachment.htm>