[arin-ppml] prop266 - re-framing the discussion

[Carlos Friaças]

Hi,

I said i don't see an issue, if other people see an issue then we need to 
address it.

So... agreed! Will work on that on a further version.

Thanks,
Carlos


On Fri, 3 May 2019, Michel Py wrote:

>>> Michel Py wrote :
>>> ARIN should not create a double standard that penalizes hijacking and tolerates squatting.
>
>> Carlos Friaças wrote :
>
>> I agree. However i'm not completely sure we'll be able to solve everything with just one proposal.
>
> You can't ask to do something now about hijacking and put squatting under the rug to be dealt with later.
> That would be a double standard. It is not acceptable.
>
> I suggest you submit a new proposal that defines both hijacking and squatting, and what you suggest ARIN should do.
>
>> I fail to see "obligations on recipients". The only obligation
>> needed is NOT announcing other parties' numbering resources.
>
> I totally disagree. Announcing other parties' numbering resources is not the only improper use.
> Using other parties' numbering resources also is improper.
> The allocation of numbering resources is so they remain unique. Regardless you announce the resource or not, using it is bad.
>
> You are asking ARIN to do something about hijacking and to tolerate squatting.
> Your own words :
>
>> Carlos Friaças wrote :
>> As long as you don't announce it to other networks i don't see an issue.
>
> This is not acceptable.
>
> Michel.
>