[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Improved IPv6 Registration Requirements

[Jason Schiller]

John,

Thanks.

My intention was to make 6.5.5.4 not be any less required or give the
impression
that it is any more optional than 6.5.5.1.

It sounds like enforcement of 6.5.5.4 "shall" could reasonably
match 6.5.5.1 shall.


Talking off line I get the impression that some people thought the intent
was that
a single complaint of a downstream customer could trigger consequences
(i.e. potential revocation of the IPv6 number resources.)  That is not my
intention.

My intention is that a single violation of 6.5.5.4 makes the ISP just as
much out of
compliance with number resource policy as a single violation of 6.5.5.1.


I support shall.

Anyone else support shall for both.5.5.4 and 6.5.5.1?
Oppose shall for 6.5.5.4 but support it for 6.5.5.1?
Oppose shall for both 6.5.5.4 and 6.5.5.1?
Either is fine?
Don't really care?

Support shall for both: 2
Oppose shall for 6.5.5.4 but support it for 6.5.5.1: 0
Oppose shall for both: 0
Either: 0
don't care: 0

(I count 7 unique posters in this thread,
and another 27 across other posts on this policy...
Of course a bunch of that is concerned with residential privacy and DNS)


___Jason

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:16 AM, james machado <hvgeekwtrvl at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I oppose as written.
>
>   I support Jason's language of replacing "should" with "shall" in 6.5.5.4.
>
> James
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
_______________________________________________________
Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170928/b29da6d8/attachment.htm>