[arin-ppml] LAST CALL - Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Improved IPv6 Registration Requirements
John Santos
john at egh.com
Thu Oct 12 11:03:11 EDT 2017
+1 Also support "shall" rather than "should"
Remember that this is a relaxation of requirements, not an increase.
Current requirements require ALL /64 and larger be registered in WHOIS.
This policy requires registration for /48 to /64 assignments only if the
recipient requests it.
On 10/12/2017 9:39 AM, Jason Schiller wrote:
> Support as written (amended with Shall).
>
> As a follow up to Owen, clarity is important.
> I urge those who do not support it as written (amended with Shall)
> to also note if they would support it without the shall amendment.
>
>
> Also as a separate question to supporting the proposal
> is if the process is supported.
>
> Can the PPM chair call separate questions?
> Yes.
>
> Can the Shepherd / AC make (minor) text changes after the 30 day freeze?
> Yes.
>
> Was there adequate discussion of the change on list and at the meeting?
> Yes.
>
> ___Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com
> <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
>
> I’d like to request that if anyone objects to the change made in
> sending the recommended draft to last call (should->shall), they
> make that clear.
>
> I believe we it is likely “Support as written” will actually be
> interpreted as “Support as amended and sent to last call”.
>
> Sorry for being pedantic, but as an AC member, I’d like to make
> sure that we have the clearest possible understanding of community
> intent as we move forward.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Owen
>
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carlton Samuels
>> <carlton.samuels at gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Support as written.
>>
>> -CAS
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> /Carlton A Samuels/
>> /Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:%28876%29%20818-1799>
>> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
>> =============================
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net
>> <mailto:info at arin.net>> wrote:
>>
>> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 6 October 2017 and
>> decided to send the following to Last Call:
>>
>> Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Improved IPv6
>> Registration Requirements
>>
>> The AC provided the following statement to the community:
>>
>> "Based on strong community support - on both the Public
>> Policy Mailing List and in person at ARIN 40 during the
>> policy consultation - for
>> replacing the "should" qualifier in section 6.5.5.4 with
>> "shall", the Advisory Council, after careful review and
>> discussion, has made the requested change to the text."
>>
>> Feedback is encouraged during the Last Call period. All
>> comments should be provided to the Public Policy Mailing
>> List. This Last Call period will expire on 10 November 2017.
>> After Last Call, the AC will conduct their Last Call review.
>>
>> The full text is below and available at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
>> <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/>
>>
>> The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>> <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sean Hopkins
>> Policy Analyst
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>>
>>
>>
>> AC's Statement of Conformance with ARIN's Principles of
>> Internet Number Resource Policy:
>>
>> This proposal is technically sound and enables fair and
>> impartial number policy for easier IPv6 Registrations. The
>> staff and legal review noted a single clarification issue
>> which has been addressed. There is ample support for the
>> proposal on PPML and no concerns have been raised by the
>> community regarding the proposal.
>>
>> Problem Statement:
>>
>> Current ARIN policy has different WHOIS directory
>> registration requirements for IPv4 vs IPv6 address
>> assignments. IPv4 registration is triggered for an assignment
>> of any address block equal to or greater than a /29 (i.e.,
>> eight IPv4 addresses). In the case of IPv6, registration
>> occurs for an assignment of any block equal to or greater
>> than a /64, which constitutes one entire IPv6 subnet and is
>> the minimum block size for an allocation. Accordingly, there
>> is a significant disparity between IPv4 and IPv6 WHOIS
>> registration thresholds in the case of assignments, resulting
>> in more work in the case of IPv6 than is the case for IPv4.
>> There is no technical or policy rationale for the disparity,
>> which could serve as a deterrent to more rapid IPv6 adoption.
>> The purpose of this proposal is to eliminate the disparity
>> and corresponding adverse consequences.
>>
>> Policy statement:
>>
>> 1) Alter section 6.5.5.1 "Reassignment information" of the
>> NRPM to strike "assignment containing a /64 or more
>> addresses" and change to "re-allocation, reassignment
>> containing a /47 or more addresses, or subdelegation of any
>> size that will be individually announced,”
>>
>> and
>>
>> 2) Alter section 6.5.5.2. "Assignments visible within 7 days"
>> of the NRPM to strike the text "4.2.3.7.1" and change to
>> “6.5.5.1"
>>
>> and
>>
>> 3) Alter section 6.5.5.3.1. "Residential Customer Privacy" of
>> the NRPM by deleting the phrase "holding /64 and larger blocks"
>>
>> and
>>
>> 4) Add new section 6.5.5.4 "Registration Requested by
>> Recipient" of the NRPM, to read: "If the downstream recipient
>> of a static assignment of /64 or more addresses requests
>> publishing of that assignment in ARIN's registration
>> database, the ISP shall register that assignment as described
>> in section 6.5.5.1."
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> a. Timetable for implementation: Policy should be adopted
>> as soon as possible.
>>
>> b. Anything else:
>>
>> Author Comments:
>>
>> IPv6 should not be more burdensome than the equivalent IPv4
>> network size. Currently, assignments of /29 or more of IPv4
>> space (8 addresses) require registration. The greatest
>> majority of ISP customers who have assignments of IPv4 space
>> are of a single IPv4 address which do not trigger any ARIN
>> registration requirement when using IPv4. This is NOT true
>> when these same exact customers use IPv6, as assignments of
>> /64 or more of IPv6 space require registration. Beginning
>> with RFC 3177, it has been standard practice to assign a
>> minimum assignment of /64 to every customer end user site,
>> and less is never used. This means that ALL IPv6 assignments,
>> including those customers that only use a single IPv4 address
>> must be registered with ARIN if they are given the minimum
>> assignment of /64 of IPv6 space. This additional effort may
>> prevent ISP's from giving IPv6 addresses because of the
>> additional expense of registering those addresses with ARIN,
>> which is not required for IPv4. The administrative burden of
>> 100% customer registration of IPv6 customers is unreasonable,
>> when such is not required for those customers receiving only
>> IPv4 connections.
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net
>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you
>> experience any issues.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net
>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you
>> experience any issues.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net
> <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you
> experience any issues.
>
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________________
> Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com
> <mailto:jschiller at google.com>|571-266-0006
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
--
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20171012/93232da3/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list