[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?

[John Curran]

On 20 Mar 2017, at 7:58 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear John,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:42:50PM +0000, John Curran wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2017, at 3:14 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
>>>> Is it the presence of legal constraints that it is the concern, or
>>>> the fact that ARIN requires explicit downloading (and thus
>>>> awareness of this fact) that is the issue?
>>> 
>>> Both are a concern. Please note that I am not advocating that all
>>> legal constraints should be lifted, for me its the results that
>>> matter: at this point in time it appears that ARIN's TAL is not
>>> bundled with common RPKI tools, and that to me is a problem.
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>> While ARIN’s Board of Trustees has been quite consistent in its
>> position that RPKI services are to be offered under clear terms and
>> conditions, I will also bring this email thread to their attention for
>> further consideration.
> 
> I was wondering whether you can provide the community with an update on
> this issue.

Job - 

Yes (and I should probably have been clearer in setting expectations 
in this regard...)

There is no update yet, as the next face-to-face meeting of the Board 
of Trustees hasn’t yet occurred.  Best ETA for an update is mid-April.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN