[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?
job at ntt.net
Mon Mar 20 19:58:39 EDT 2017
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:42:50PM +0000, John Curran wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 3:14 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> >> Is it the presence of legal constraints that it is the concern, or
> >> the fact that ARIN requires explicit downloading (and thus
> >> awareness of this fact) that is the issue?
> > Both are a concern. Please note that I am not advocating that all
> > legal constraints should be lifted, for me its the results that
> > matter: at this point in time it appears that ARIN's TAL is not
> > bundled with common RPKI tools, and that to me is a problem.
> While ARIN’s Board of Trustees has been quite consistent in its
> position that RPKI services are to be offered under clear terms and
> conditions, I will also bring this email thread to their attention for
> further consideration.
I was wondering whether you can provide the community with an update on
More information about the ARIN-PPML