[arin-ppml] IPv4 SWIP requirements (?)

[William Herrin]

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:25 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On 15 Jun 2017, at 5:16 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>
> I'm of the opinion that if nobody minds, it doesn't matter. Thus I'd like
> to see complaint-triggered review of SWIP compliance with some kind of
> "reasonable" threshold for honest error and some kind of escalating penalty
> for repeat offense. Is that policy or business practice?
>
>
> There’s substantial policy issues in that (e.g. threshold for compliance,
> registry implications of penalties) that you should use the policy process
> for discussion.  If there is a consensus on a path forward, the ARIN AC
> is quite capable of phrasing the final policy with appropriate suggestions
> on specifics of implementation (e.g. fees/penalties) that the Board can
> then review and ratify as appropriate.
>

Tempting, but I've come to feel like Charlie Brown to your Lucy the last
few times I've tried so if it's all the same to you I'm going to sit here
and throw peanuts from the gallery.

Regards,
Bill


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170616/a292550d/attachment.htm>