[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Paul McNary]

I think the SWIP requirement should be the same as what is routable 
internet wide.
/24 for IPV4 and whatever for IPV6. Anything less is the /24 holder's 
problem to deal with.
If it is public routable then require SWIP otherwise let the routable 
holder manage it.
Blacklists deal with it that way. Every had a /25 that the other 
associated /25 had spammers on it?
Lots of fun! :-)
Now if the blacklist characters would work with the smaller IP ranges 
that would be great, but will they?

Paul McNary
pmcnary at cameron.net


On 6/6/2017 3:10 PM, Roberts, Orin wrote:
>
> /“Since we require SWIP for IPv4 /24s”///
>
> ARIN also currently requires a SWIP for an IPv4 /29 , which makes 
>  “/60" a more applicable reference point; unless the intent is to 
> minimize or eliminate SWIPs for IPv6 (ISPs won’t mind).
>
> Orin
>
> *From:*ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] *On Behalf Of 
> *William Herrin
> *Sent:* June-06-17 3:04 PM
> *To:* Leif Sawyer
> *Cc:* arin-ppml at arin.net
> *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of 
> Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com 
> <mailto:lsawyer at gci.com>> wrote:
>
>     The boundaries at /60, /56, and /48  have all been discussed.  If
>     one is more favorable than
>     the other, and you would like to see the proposal edited to use
>     that one, we will certainly
>     take that under advisory.
>
> Hi Leif,
>
> IMHO, IPv6 /48 = IPv4 /24. Since we require SWIP for IPv4 /24s, we 
> should require it for IPv6 /48s.
>
> I'd be comfortable with "more than a /56" and "more than a /60." I 
> prefer "more than a /56."
>
> I would oppose "/60 or more" or "/56 or more" because I believe that 
> would encourage ISPs to engage in unhealthy assignment practices to 
> avoid SWIP reporting, such as assigning /64s, /61s and /57s.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Herrin
>
> -- 
>
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com 
> <mailto:herrin at dirtside.com> bill at herrin.us <mailto:bill at herrin.us>
> Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170606/29d32e16/attachment.htm>