[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Paul McNary]

+1
That is what I agree with.

However reading the ARIN reassignment web page they are showing
policy that /60 should be SWIP'ed on IPv6 and /29 on IPv4.

Thanks you
Paul


On 7/17/2017 5:46 PM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
> The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47:
>
> Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or 
> subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall 
> be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service 
> which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>
> The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP 
> requirement for /48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger 
> blocks require SWIP, and blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and 
> of course also non-routeable.
>
> This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only 
> blocks that are individually announced.  I could go either way on this 
> issue.
>
> Albert Erdmann
> Network Administrator
> Paradise On Line Inc.
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote:
>
>> Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
>>
>> Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody.   There's certainly a 
>> lot to think about here.
>>
>> Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is 
>> located here:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551
>>
>> And, to help clarify some confusion, per  6.5.5.3.1 
>> (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
>> residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks"   may use 
>> censored data,  i.e.  "Private Customer/Residence"
>> in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> With that said,  I have a couple of questions to ask, based on 
>> potential rewrites that are brewing.
>>
>> First:    Assuming a preference for /56  (based on PPML feedback)  
>> for the moment,   which is the more
>> preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?
>>
>>
>> a)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more 
>> addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a 
>> distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>>
>>
>>
>> b)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more 
>> addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually 
>> announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a 
>> distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>>
>>
>> Second:   Given your specific choice of A or B,  are you 
>> preferentially inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
>>
>> Third:  If none of these options are palatable, do you have a 
>> proposed approach?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>  Leif Sawyer
>> Advisory Council
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>