[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2016-7 -- Integrate community networks into Existing ISP Policy

David Farmer farmer at umn.edu
Tue Jan 17 14:42:11 EST 2017


It concerns me that no one that operates a community network has commented
on this policy.  Further it concerns me that no one from the general ARIN
policy community commented either, only AC members and a former AC member
who is also the policy author have made any comments.

Is there interest from the ARIN policy community to work on this or are
their other priorities for the community's time?

It would be helpful to hear from others in regards to if this is something
we should be working on or not.

Thanks.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:

> It would be especially helpful for the AC if those who operate community
> networks could review the proposed draft policy and see if the problem
> statement highlights an issue for operators and if the proposed text solves
> this problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
>
> On 12/15/2016 3:30 PM, Kevin Blumberg wrote:
>
> Owen,
>
> As the author of 2016-7 I disagree.
>
> The change in 2016-6 had no meaningful impact to the usefulness of Community
> Networks. T
>
> The purpose of 2016-7 was to significantly reduce the red tape requirements
> with Community Networks.
>
> I believe that without this kind of policy Community Network's will never
> get used given the onerous requirements.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Blumberg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net>] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 4:19 PM
> To: ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml at arin.net> <arin-ppml at arin.net>
> Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2016-7 -- Integrate community networks
> into Existing ISP Policy
>
> I believe that this proposal no longer has relevance given the advancement
> of 2016-6 and its rewrite of the community networks policy to the board.
>
> If anyone feels that the AC should not abandon this proposal at their
> January meeting, please speak up.
>
> Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
> Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170117/1d53d82b/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list