[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?

[William Herrin]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2017, at 12:29 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> As you are aware, we provide legacy resource holders the same registry
>>> services (including ability to update Whois contact info, reverse DNS, etc.)
>>> that they received at ARIN’s formation, and that is done no charge and with
>>> no  requirement for any agreement.
>>
>> Exactly. You refuse to provide new services related to legacy resource
>> holdings, including RPKI. While not unreasonable in the context of
>> ARIN operations, this is harmful to the RPKI efforts.
>
> To be clear, we offer all registry services to all resources holders under the
> same terms, but I do agree that having a segment of resource holders that
> do not wish to participate in the ARIN community nor support it financially
> does detract somewhat from community initiatives such as RPKI.   This
> is unfortunate, but seems to slowly diminishing over time via both IPv4
> transfers and IPv6 deployment.

John,

Respectfully, the all-or-nothing requirement isn't something
mysteriously and unfortunately happening to you. ARIN is the cause.

Regards,
Bill Herrin




-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>