[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?

[John Curran]

On 3 Feb 2017, at 10:47 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> 
> Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant.

ARIN is actually quite active in development, promotion, and support 
of RPKI services – please do not confuse having appropriate legal 
agreements with level of enthusiasm...

> It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI
> information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first
> entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI. 


As you are aware, we provide legacy resource holders the same registry
services (including ability to update Whois contact info, reverse DNS, etc.)
that they received at ARIN’s formation, and that is done no charge and with 
no  requirement for any agreement.  Resource holders who want newer 
services paid for by the community are expected join and pay the same 
fees as others in that community. 

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN