[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?

[William Herrin]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> Please keep in mind that this thread was about removing barriers, to
> enable RPKI innovation.

Hi folks,

Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant.
It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI
information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first
entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI.

Classically ARIN has had a minimalist role in routing policy
decisions. This has been considered a good thing. Fundamentally, RPKI
is routing policy. Maybe another organization should be created to
manage RPKI in North America, one which doesn't suffer ARIN's mindset.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>