[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks

Richard J. Letts rjletts at uw.edu
Thu Sep 24 23:46:42 EDT 2015


b) 
There is no definitive outcome from the policy change, which makes me feel that it's not worth changing -- the problem statement argument is weak at best.

It is potentially enabling organizations with more money than need gain more resources, potentially at the expense of non-profit and educational organizations who might not be able to raise cash for additional IPv4 space [or equipment to support a transition to IPv6]. Changing policy just to (potentially) improve the accuracy of a database seems not worth the (potential) risk.

Richard


________________________________________
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> on behalf of Dani Roisman <droisman at softlayer.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:20 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks

| Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400
| From: ARIN <info at arin.net>
| To: arin-ppml at arin.net
| Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
|       evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
| Message-ID: <56031167.1010007 at arin.net>
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
|
| Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
| Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4
| transfers of IPv4 netblocks
|
| On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
| "ARIN-prop-223 Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3,
| and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks" as a Draft Policy.
|
| Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9 is below and can be found at:
| https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2015_9.html

Greetings,

There has been some stimulating dialog about the merits of 2015-9.  I'd like to ask that in addition to any overall support or lack thereof, you also review the policy language and comment specifically on the changes proposed:
a) For those of you generally in support of this effort, are there any refinements to the changes made which you think will improve this should these policy changes be implemented?
b) For those of you generally opposed to this effort, are there any adjustments to the policy changes which, if implemented, would gain your support?

--
Dani Roisman
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list