[arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 16:07:50 EDT 2015


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Reducing the burden on ARIN staff is not part of the problem statement for
> this proposal (though it might be a side effect, depending on how they
> implement it).  The main goal here is to reduce the administrative burden
> on organizations who need to acquire IPv4 space via transfer.  That burden
> may actually be higher for smaller entities who don't have experience with
> and processes in place for jumping through ARIN's hoops.
>
> I don't think this policy would have much impact on the ability of large
> well-funded entities to purchase as much address space as they like.
> Currently, those organizations simply write a contract that gives them full
> rights to the address space they're buying, and allows them to transfer the
> space with ARIN whenever they are ready to put it into use on their network
> (or can otherwise pass ARIN's needs justification tests).
>
>
>

Let me give you a real world example.

1. Buy rights to use addresses in any quantity you believe you need
2. Use those addresses as you need them, assuming the agreement you made
with the party works properly
3. Get an LOA from the documented owner
4. Bypass ARIN entirely
5. Use the addresses.

How do you think we should solve that problem?


Best,

-M<
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20151005/28338b6c/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list