[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-2: Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients)

[Adam Thompson]

Unless I've missed something, the change in question only affects purchased or transferred blocks, not blocks coming from inventory.
As far as I know, big and small players already pay the same price in the transfer market.
The existing policies only seem to affect large corporations in the first place, so don't disadvantage the small org AFAICT.  Considering I'm always complaining about vsmall orgs being ignored, I'd like to see a situation where this change negatively images them, if I've missed it.
(Apologies for top-posting from mobile..)
-Adam

On May 26, 2015 6:23:16 PM CDT, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
>On 5/26/15 16:14, David Huberman wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>> I don't understand your position.
>>
>> There's no free pool. All space comes from the market.
>>
>> A small actor pays money to get her necessary space from the market.
>> A large actor pays money to get her necessary space from the market.
>>
>> How does the large actor moving space they hold from ARIN to CNNIC
>disadvantage the small actor?
>>
>
>
>ARIN still appears to have IPv4 inventory to fulfill requests that I 
>think of when I think "small actor", like /24's and /23's. The size
>that 
>probably can't match what a company like Microsoft can pay for IP
>space. 
>What do you consider small?
>
>~Seth
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150526/350ba519/attachment.htm>