[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7: Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers

Michael Peddemors michael at linuxmagic.com
Tue Jun 23 20:56:27 EDT 2015


Opposed.

On 15-06-23 05:39 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I am opposed to this proposal.
>
> It is yet another attempt to chip away at needs basis by those seeking
> to provide for unlimited and unrestricted transfers.
>
> The community has repeatedly indicated that the preservation of needs
> basis is important and virtually every proposal
> seeking to eliminate it has been rebuffed by the community.
>
> This proposal should, IMHO, be recognized for what it is… A clear effort
> to reduce the needs-basis requirements for transfers.
>
> Owen
>
>> On Jun 23, 2015, at 17:31 , Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com
>> <mailto:scottleibrand at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at
>> <mailto:matthew at matthew.at>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
>>
>>         Draft Policy ARIN-2015-7
>>         Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
>>
>>
>>     I support this policy, but would be even happier if we simply had
>>     a trigger that said "when ARIN is out of IPv4 addresses, this
>>     simplified policy replaces all other tests for IPv4 transfers and
>>     the other sections are inactive until such time as ARIN has a new
>>     large free pool of IPv4 addresses (never)"
>>
>>
>> The main reason we didn't write a replacement for section 4 is this:
>>
>>     Organizations that do not meet the simplified criteria above may
>>     instead demonstrate the need for number resources using the
>>     criteria in section 4 of the NRPM.
>>
>>
>> There will likely be some sections of the community who feel that
>> their particular need for IPv4 is better met under section 4 than
>> under this simplified policy.  Rather than trying to identify every
>> such need and write in exceptions, I felt it would be better to first
>> allow everyone using the transfer market to opt out of section 4
>> entirely, and then once we have some experience with which requests
>> actually still end up using section 4, we will have some data on which
>> parts of it we need to keep and which can be eliminated in a
>> simplification cleanup proposal.
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net
>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list