[arin-ppml] Requesting Feedback: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-22: Removal of Minimum in Section 4.10
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Fri Jan 9 13:48:23 EST 2015
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 10:33 , Karl Brumund <kbrumund at dyn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Heather Schiller <heather.skanks at gmail.com <mailto:heather.skanks at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Happy New Year PPML!
>>
>> As one of the shepherds of this policy, it would be very helpful to hear from the community on this proposal. Comments for or against are welcome, as are any questions.
>>
>
> Reading 2008-5, it appears that the authors at the time expected that ISPs may relax their filter rules to allow longer than /24 routes. Given that doing so would encourage a lot more deaggregation of existing /24s, I find it unlikely that ISPs will permit longer than /24 in any appreciable number to matter.
> Thus it seems that having a minimum of /28 for direct allocations is impractical, and that these would happen through assignments, as today.
As one of the authors of 2008-5, yes, you are (mostly) correct.
I didn’t expect ISPs to relax their filters in general, but I did expect ISPs might relax their filters for this particular designated block. I don’t see any reason that wouldn’t be possible even now as that would not encourage (or even allow) deaggregation of existing /24s.
We are talking about a relatively small block being preserved to provide minimal resources for (primarily) post-runout new entrants (or at least that was my intent at the time of writing).
> I see nothing wrong with 2014-22, but am open to hearing other comments.
I see no advantage to 2014-22. I think when this block comes into play, since it is a particular designated block, ISPs will react relatively quickly to allow longer prefixes within this space when it becomes necessary.
Since it is only a single /10, even at /28, we’re talking about a maximum of 16,384 additional prefixes.
Owen
>
> …karl
>
>> You may want to read this report from RIPE Labs, specifically discussing the existing policy, and tests they did on routability of small prefixes.
>>
>> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-prefixes <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-prefixes>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> --Heather
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ARIN <info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net>>
>> Date: Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:35 PM
>> Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-22: Removal of Minimum in Section 4.10
>> To: arin-ppml at arin.net <mailto:arin-ppml at arin.net>
>>
>>
>> On 20 November 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-214 Removal of Minimum in Section 4.10" as a Draft Policy.
>>
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-22 is below and can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_22.html <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_22.html>
>>
>> You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft
>> Policy 2014-22 on the Public Policy Mailing List.
>>
>> The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance
>> of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource
>> Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are:
>>
>> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
>> * Technically Sound
>> * Supported by the Community
>>
>> The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html>
>>
>> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Communications and Member Services
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>>
>>
>> ## * ##
>>
>>
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-22
>> Removal of Minimum in Section 4.10
>>
>> Date: 25 November 2014
>>
>> Problem Statement:
>>
>> The current section 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment creates an issue where a small new organization that requires an IPv4 allocation or assignment would potentially receive a block that today would be unroutable and therefore unusable for it intended purposes.
>>
>> Policy statement:
>>
>> Change
>>
>> "This block will be subject to a minimum size allocation of /28 and a maximum size allocation of /24. ARIN should use sparse allocation when possible within that /10 block."
>>
>> To
>>
>> "This block will be subject to an allocation of /24. ARIN should use sparse allocation when possible within that /10 block."
>>
>> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150109/216d049f/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list