[arin-ppml] Proposal ARIN-2015-8

[Jose R. de la Cruz III]

RE: ARIN-2015-8

4.     Should End-Users who want to be able to re-assign records simply be
required to become ISPs?
--->No. Why should they?

5.     Should the ISP/End-User distinction be eliminated (which is a bigger
discussion outside the scope of the current problem statement)?
---> No. They are different type of business entities and should be
serviced according to their needs.

José
jrdelacruz at acm.org

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Christian Tacit <ctacit at tacitlaw.com> wrote:

> I am writing on behalf of the ARIN AC to seek additional input from the
> community regarding how (or if) we should proceed with ARIN-2015-8.
>
>
>
> The feedback received at ARIN 36 and in subsequent AC discussions has been
> very mixed and there is no community consensus for the proposal in its
> present form.
>
>
>
> Some of the main points made at ARIN 36 and the subsequent AC meeting were:
>
>
>
> 1.     Orgs should not be able to by-pass the fee structures and other
> policy consequences of being classified as ISPs, and the draft policy would
> facilitate this type of by-pass;
>
> 2.     Some of those who shared the concern in point 1. said that they
> would still support allowing Orgs to SWIP to themselves (and possibly to
> related Orgs) to facilitate geolocation and this will be even more
> important in an IPv6 environment where assigned address blocks are much
> bigger and so often not used at one location;
>
> 3.     ARIN already allows RWHOIS to be used by End-Users, which leads to
> the question of whether this avenue should be foreclosed, End-User SWIPs
> should be allowed or the status quo should be left in place;
>
> 4.     Should End-Users who want to be able to re-assign records simply
> be required to become ISPs?
>
> 5.     Should the ISP/End-User distinction be eliminated (which is a
> bigger discussion outside the scope of the current problem statement)?
>
> 6.     If the ISP/End-User fee distinction were eliminated, would there
> still be opposition to the draft policy?
>
> 7.     To what extent is there value or do problems get created if
> End-Users can SWIP (i.e., improving the accuracy of database information
> vs. possibly facilitating a “grey market” where the true registered users
> of numbering resources are not known)? and
>
> 8.     Does the problem statement need to be reformulated, and if so, how?
>
>
>
> If you would like to see further work on this policy, please let us at the
> AC know what form you think that work should take. If you think the policy
> should be abandonded altogether we would like to know that as well.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> Christian S. Tacit,
> Tacit Law
>
> P.O. Box 24210 RPO Hazeldean
> Kanata, Ontario
> K2M 2C3 Canada
>
> Tel: +1 613 599 5345
> Fax: +1 613 248 5175
> E-mail: ctacit at tacitlaw.com
>
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is subject to
> copyright, privileged, confidential, proprietary or exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
> responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying or in any way
> using this message. If you have received this communication in error,
> please notify the sender and destroy or delete copies you may have
> received.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20151204/b5bae7cb/attachment.htm>