owen at delong.com
Thu Aug 27 17:09:45 EDT 2015
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 09:20 , Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
> On 8/27/2015 4:45 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
>> "This policy proposal stretches across responsibilities areas as it impacts
>> > number policy, ARIN operational practice, and fees."
>> What would the result of orgs. being allowed to create re assignment records, yet failing to do so? Or, what would be their motivation to maintain an acceptible level of accuracy?
> The way the policy is written so far, additional reassignment records, are optional. If the community wanted to see end-users add reassignment records as a requirement, that is a discussion that the community should have and draft those expectations into policy.
I remain unconvinced that even allowing end user reassignment records is a good idea.
However, you are right as to discussing requiring them.
However, even if we make them optional, Rudy raises a good and valid point about what is in place to ensure that they remain at all accurate.
More information about the ARIN-PPML