[arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7
matthew at matthew.at
Thu Aug 20 21:14:59 EDT 2015
On 8/20/2015 1:04 PM, Brian Jones wrote:
> I agree with this simplified requirement but would even be willing to
> accept a 50% within 12 months and 75% in 24 months requirement. Two
> years is a long time to tie up valuable resources that are not being
> used. IMHO
I do not understand this reasoning. There is no more free pool. If Org A
is not using "valuable resources" and they are transferred to Org B who
was mistaken about how fast they will use them, then Org B is also not
using "valuable resources". But if instead Org A can't transfer them,
then Org B doesn't get them and Org A still has "valuable resources"
which are "tied up". They're "tied up" not being used either way... and
ARIN can't do anything about it.
If you really want to make sure that these resources don't sit unused,
make it so that after Org A transfers to Org B then if Org B doesn't use
all of them, Org B can sell what they're not using.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML