[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: SimplifyingMinimumAllocations and Assignments
owen at delong.com
Thu Sep 4 13:53:53 EDT 2014
On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Bruce Cornett <bcornett at servlet.com> wrote:
> For what it is worth, I think this is a good policy for the smaller guys.
> I have two clients that desperately want their own allocation. One runs a WISP with a /24 and the other high security cloud stack with a /22.
> Both need to double immediately. And I hate parting with the address space. They cannot meet the /20 criteria and giving them addresses from our space limits our business model - because granting that won't push us to the point where we can request more. And dual homing them doesn't do anything for my business.
In about two weeks, they will be able to qualify at the /24 level, and the /20 criteria completely goes away based on policy which has already been adopted and is pending implementation.
Given that, do you still see a need for this proposal?
More information about the ARIN-PPML