[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: SimplifyingMinimumAllocations and Assignments

[Bruce Cornett]

Guys

Seth pointed out that my clients' issue is solved with 
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_13.html

And that is in fact true.  And indeed they can meet the criteria.

So I retract my comment.

Bruce C
On 09/04/2014 11:49 AM, Bruce Cornett wrote:
> For what it is worth, I think this is a good policy for the smaller guys.
>
> I have two clients that desperately want their own allocation. One 
> runs a WISP with a /24 and the other high security cloud stack with a 
> /22.
>
> Both need to double immediately.  And I hate parting with the address 
> space.  They cannot meet the /20 criteria and giving them addresses 
> from our space limits our business model - because granting that won't 
> push us to the point where we can request more. And dual homing them 
> doesn't do anything for my business.
>
> It seems to me that this policy resolves that issue and will allow 
> these clients to properly address their business model.  And allow us 
> to properly address our business plan without depleting our address 
> space prematurely.
>
> It's a good thing.
>
> Bruce C
>
>
>
>
> On 09/03/2014 09:36 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I can stand up a bunch of organizations almost overni
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.