[arin-ppml] Comments about the draft policies:
bill at herrin.us
Thu Oct 9 14:35:21 EDT 2014
2014-1 out of region use:
OPPOSE. ARIN is not IANA. It is not and should not be an address
registry to the world, not should it be a flag-of-convenience registry
for multinational organizations.
2014-9 address reclamation during transfer
SUPPORT as written
2014-14 transfers needs test
OPPOSE as written. /16 is not small. I would support something like
this proposal at /22 or /24.
2014-15 ASN transfers
2014-16 austerity policy
OPPOSE. Assignments from the /10 are hard to get? Good. They're supposed to be.
2014-17 utilization requirements
With the addition of a 50% utilization requirement for each allocation
in addition to the 80% aggregate requirement I would support this
2014-18 automatic qualification
OPPOSE. I could get behind multihoming as the sole requirement for a
minimum assignment but not a free-for-all. It isn't 1993 any more.
2014-19 MDN subsequent assignment
Support, though I wonder if the MDN structure isn't growing unwieldy.
I see an implication of something broken elsewhere in our process.
2014-20 transfer policy simplified needs
OPPOSE as written. Too complex. Too many special cases. Too much
opportunity for abuse. Simplify please!
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
May I solve your unusual networking challenges?
More information about the ARIN-PPML