[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculatingutilization

[Mike Burns]

Support.


-----Original Message----- 
From: Owen DeLong
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:19 AM
To: Jeffrey Lyon
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of 
calculatingutilization

I would support.

Owen

On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> 
wrote:

> Friends, Colleagues,
>
> A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the
> utilization requirement for new requests is being calculated on a per
> allocation basis rather than in aggregate. For example, if an
> organization has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the
> fourth utilized at 75%, that request would be denied. This is a bit
> out of balance as an organization with a single /20 utilized at 80%
> would have less efficient utilization but would be eligible to request
> additional space.
>
> The last time this was discussed it sounded as if the community would
> support a policy proposal to change this calculation to be considered
> in aggregate vs. per assignment. Does this remain the case?
>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP
> Fellow, Black Lotus Communications
> mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: 
> blacklotus.net
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.