[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculating utilization

[Paul S.]

If this was actually drafted, I would too.

Doesn't seem like a bad thing.

On 5/1/2014 午後 03:19, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I would support.
>
> Owen
>
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>
>> Friends, Colleagues,
>>
>> A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the
>> utilization requirement for new requests is being calculated on a per
>> allocation basis rather than in aggregate. For example, if an
>> organization has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the
>> fourth utilized at 75%, that request would be denied. This is a bit
>> out of balance as an organization with a single /20 utilized at 80%
>> would have less efficient utilization but would be eligible to request
>> additional space.
>>
>> The last time this was discussed it sounded as if the community would
>> support a policy proposal to change this calculation to be considered
>> in aggregate vs. per assignment. Does this remain the case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- 
>> Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP
>> Fellow, Black Lotus Communications
>> mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: blacklotus.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.