[arin-ppml] Potentially credible v4 number pricing data

[Jeffrey Lyon]

Michel,

I personally disagree that smaller assignments have market value. As
the prefixes get shorter, the aftermarket appeal is likely much
higher. (note: I do have some experience in this space in working with
private equity on M&A proposals for our company).

Thanks, Jeff

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Michel Py
<michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>> Martin Hannigan wrote :
>> It would be more credible if the actual block was
>> published, but this is interesting regardless.
>> http://www.ipv4auctions.com/
>
> About 6 weeks ago, I came up with the following:
>
> +--------+-------+--------+-------+
> ! Prefix !  #IPs ! Per IP !  Cost !
> +--------+-------+--------+-------+
> !    /16 ! 65536 !    $10 ! $655K !
> !    /18 ! 16384 !    $12 ! $196K !
> !    /20 !  4096 !    $15 !  $61K !
> !    /22 !  1024 !    $22 !  $22K !
> +--------+-------+--------+-------+
>
> I don't have any scientific pretentions about the validity of this data,
> YMMV, blah blah. What is advertised is not what is sold, at this point
> in time though I don't think that it matters much to the debate if an IP
> is $7 per pop or $15 per pop.
>
> My files here: http://ipvii.com/
>
> Michel.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



-- 
Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP
Fellow, Black Lotus Communications
mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: blacklotus.net