[arin-ppml] LAST CALL: Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2013-8: Subsequent Allocations for New Multiple Discrete Networks

[Martin Hannigan]

Scott,

There have been more objections than mine all along the route. We pay
ARIN millions in fees. We simply ask that ARIN do what we believe is best.

Assuming that this is simply about my opinion demonstrates ARINs
usual arrogance.

Best,

-M<

On Monday, June 30, 2014, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:

> I was in the room as well.  I heard your objections in Chicago (
> https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_33/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_11)
> "to the contract issue".  Since then, ARIN-2013-8 has been revised to
> address your concern, and in fact no longer requires any contracts for
> connectivity, but simply "evidence of deployment of the new discrete
> network site".
>
> Since that revision, ARIN-2013-8 was also discussed at the ARIN PPC and
> NANOG 61 in Bellevue.  I don't recall or see (
> https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ppc_nanog61/ppc_transcript.html#anchor_3)
> that you (or anyone else) raised any concerns at that meeting.
>
> I believe the main objection you expressed at the ARIN 33 meeting has been
> addressed.  If you have another objection, or you feel it hasn't been
> addressed, please provide some additional details.  Otherwise, this will be
> my last message on this topic.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hannigan at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm clear. I was in the room. My perspective is that they didn't listen.
>>
>> They (you) can feel free to demonstrate to us that they did.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -M<
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 30, 2014, at 20:17, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jcurran at arin.net');>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:59 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hannigan at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Asking me to do the work the AC ...
>> >
>> > To be clear, the draft policy was revised based on the
>> > input received and the AC is doing -_their_ job by asking
>> > if there remains any objections.
>> >
>> > The job of those in the community is to express any concerns
>> > that they still have with regards to the recommended draft policy.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > /John
>> >
>> > John Curran
>> > President and CEO
>> > ARIN
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140630/2a67562e/attachment.htm>