[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculatingutilization ARIN-2014-17
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net
Thu Jun 26 12:51:30 EDT 2014
Yes, -10 actually.
On Jun 26, 2014 12:50 PM, "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
> I'm still not understanding the connection, 2014-7 deals with the number
> of organizations in an internet exchange point to qualify for a direct
> allocation from ARIN. Are you thinking of a different policy?
> On 6/26/2014 9:33 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> To escape the issue of having to justify numerous smaller assignments
> individually one could have requested transition space in am attempt to
> Thanks, Jeff
> On Jun 26, 2014 11:50 AM, "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
>> Can you please explain why you believe 2014-7 effects the discussion of
>> 2014-17? They appear unrelated to me.
>> On 6/26/2014 8:39 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>> The recent adoption of ARIN-2014-7 makes 2014-17 even more crucial.
>> Thanks, Jeff
>> On Jun 25, 2014 4:54 PM, "Gary Buhrmaster" <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
>>> <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>>> > Owen,
>>> > I would be extremely grateful if you would be kind enough to take
>>> > charge of introducing the removal of needs testing for /20 and longer
>>> > as a policy proposal.
>>> Perhaps I was unclear in my reply. I apologize.
>>> My support was for Owen's suggestion of an
>>> immediate need policy clarification, not for any
>>> removal of needs testing. I do not support removal
>>> of needs testing. Do not use my reply to support
>>> your position. Thank you.
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML