<p dir="ltr">Yes, -10 actually. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks, Jeff</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 26, 2014 12:50 PM, "Andrew Dul" <<a href="mailto:andrew.dul@quark.net">andrew.dul@quark.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div>I'm still not understanding the
      connection, 2014-7 deals with the number of organizations in an
      internet exchange point to qualify for a direct allocation from
      ARIN.  Are you thinking of a different policy?<br>
      <br>
      Andrew  <br>
      <br>
      On 6/26/2014 9:33 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <p dir="ltr">Andrew, </p>
      <p dir="ltr">To escape the issue of having to justify numerous
        smaller assignments individually one could have requested
        transition space in am attempt to aggregate. </p>
      <p dir="ltr">Thanks, Jeff</p>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 26, 2014 11:50 AM, "Andrew Dul"
        <<a href="mailto:andrew.dul@quark.net" target="_blank">andrew.dul@quark.net</a>>
        wrote:<br type="attribution">
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
            <div>Jeff,<br>
              <br>
              Can you please explain why you believe 2014-7 effects the
              discussion of 2014-17?  They appear unrelated to me.<br>
              <br>
              Thanks,<br>
              Andrew<br>
              <br>
              On 6/26/2014 8:39 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <p dir="ltr">The recent adoption of ARIN-2014-7 makes
                2014-17 even more crucial. </p>
              <p dir="ltr">Thanks, Jeff</p>
              <div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 25, 2014 4:54 PM, "Gary
                Buhrmaster" <<a href="mailto:gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com" target="_blank">gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com</a>>
                wrote:<br type="attribution">
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On
                  Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jeffrey Lyon<br>
                  <<a href="mailto:jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net" target="_blank">jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                  > Owen,<br>
                  ><br>
                  > I would be extremely grateful if you would be
                  kind enough to take<br>
                  > charge of introducing the removal of needs
                  testing for /20 and longer<br>
                  > as a policy proposal.<br>
                  <br>
                  Perhaps I was unclear in my reply.  I apologize.<br>
                  My support was for Owen's suggestion of an<br>
                  immediate need policy clarification, not for any<br>
                  removal of needs testing.  I do not support removal<br>
                  of needs testing.  Do not use my reply to support<br>
                  your position.  Thank you.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset></fieldset>
              <br>
              <pre>_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net" target="_blank">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a>
Please contact <a href="mailto:info@arin.net" target="_blank">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

</blockquote></div>