[arin-ppml] support for 2014-1 (out of region use)

[William Herrin]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:02 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> On 2/7/14, 22:58 , William Herrin wrote:
>> You pulled a TLDR on me. Like I said at the end of the message: after
>> you admit that the reason you (the general you, not you specifically)
>> don't want this policy is that you've knowingly been doing things
>> wrong for the last decade plus, you add the following sentence to the
>> still concise policy.
>
>
> How do you justify saying they've been doing anything wrong? Nothing in
> policy says that its wrong.  The only thing in policy, says is ARIN's
> primary role is issuing resources for use within the region.

Hi David,

Asked and answered. I'm also very comfortable declaring spam as
"wrong," even the stuff that isn't outright illegal.

When one competitor has greater regulatory access to resources than
another, you set the stage for anti-competitive practices. When that
extra access is used to ease one's burden to a competitor's detriment,
it's wrong. Quintessentially unfair. Whether or not it's against the
letter of the rules.

The address shortage has exacerbated the problem and it isn't likely
to wane on its own for the remainder of IPv4's useful lifespan.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004