[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

[John Curran]

On Apr 3, 2014, at 7:43 PM, xiaofan yang <nikiyangxf at gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks for your inspiring reply.  Now i know that we have the "ownership" of those IPs.    as you are one of the AC, i take your reply seriously and also this is good news for the community, especially for those legacy holders, if the holder of ARIN non-legacy IPs can have the "ownership'  then the holder of legacy IPs definitely has the ownership  on their IPs  no matter whether they sign the RSA , LRSA or not.


I believe that your assertions above are unlikely to work out as you might expect, 
and, as noted earlier, you might want to seek out legal advice in these matters.

Best wishes,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN