[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
jcurran at arin.net
Fri Mar 29 16:12:42 EDT 2013
On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:03 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> On 3/29/13 14:34 , John Curran wrote:
>> Unless otherwise directed by policy, IPv6 /36 allocations shall be from a reserved /32 and /40 would be from a reserved /36 (just as /32's come from /28 reserved blocks)
> That tells me if our policy intent is to have both /36 and /40 allocations for LIRs to be made from a /32 reserved block then we need to explicitly state that in the policy and the last sentence is necessary.
> Any objection to it staying in the policy statement?
Can you explain why it is desirable
to allocate /40's from a reserved /32?
Should /36's be from a /28 as well?
(Or should all of them be from reserved /28's?)
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML