[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-2: 3GPP Network IP Resource Policy

[Masato Yamanishi]

Scott,

Can we assume it intends to change the IPv4 policy only?

Though the problem statement describes about IPv4,
the policy statement doesn't specify IPv4 or both.

Rgs,
---
Masato Yamanishi
Softbank Telecom America (former Japan Telecom America)




On 13/03/27 12:41, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> As one of the AC shepherds for the policy, I am hoping to have a
>>discussion,
>> both here on PPML at at the upcoming ARIN meeting, to cover a few key
>> points:
>>
>>  - Is the problem statement clear to the community?
>
>Yes. Existing software limitations make it difficult to impossible to
>run a reliable 3GPP network at greater than around 40% utilization of
>addresses versus connected subscribers. Current ARIN standards require
>80% (?) utilization.
>
>>  - Do you feel that it is an important problem to try to solve?
>
>Yes.
>
>>  - If so, how would you prefer we approach solving it?
>
>Dual stack: IPv4 CGN plus IPv6.
>
>This problem is not unique to 3GPP architectures. Virtually every
>eyeball network has a version this problem with similarly scoped
>technical limitations. The ship sailed on solving it with more IPv4
>addresses years ago. What's "special" here that makes it any different
>from everybody else's unmet need?
>
>Regards,
>Bill Herrin
>
>
>-- 
>William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
>3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.