[arin-ppml] fee structure

[John Curran]

On Mar 29, 2013, at 1:44 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> Hi John,
> 
> It would be appropriate for ISPs and End-users to have identical
> standing before ARIN, in number policy, in membership and in fees.
> That is not the case and is not on the table.

Bill -

With the revised fee schedule, we're actually getting a lot closer to that 
outcome ("identical standing before ARIN, in number policy, in membership 
and in fees") than we were before, and it's certainly a possible to take 
that next step in the future, if the members desire such. (Note - I believe 
it would result in a significant increase in end-user fees, but it really
does depend on how the distribution of costs is accomplished.)

Feel free to propose it as a future refinement; you can send it to the
ARIN Suggestion Process <https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/acsp.html>
or to the ARIN Board of Trustees as you feel appropriate.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN