[arin-ppml] fee structure
bill at herrin.us
Fri Mar 29 13:44:11 EDT 2013
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:45 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> Would it not be appropriate that an organization that wishes
> to participate as a member pay its share of ARIN costs which
> are currently borne by the remaining ~4100 members?
It would be appropriate for ISPs and End-users to have identical
standing before ARIN, in number policy, in membership and in fees.
That is not the case and is not on the table.
Under the pending fee schedule, annual end-user fees increase.
Typically by double with the expectation that IPv6 deployment will
result in the fees tripling. At least some ISP fees go down. Is it not
appropriate, then, that end users' standing before ARIN improve while
ISPs' standing deteriorates in comparable measure?
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML