[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[John Curran]

On Mar 28, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, John Curran wrote:
> 
>> I believe that the "/48 or smaller" line on the pending fee
>> schedule is incorrect and in the process of being fixed.
> 
> Now that makes all the difference in the world if that were to happen.

Agreed.

>> The correct number in the series should read "/40 or less"
>> Once corrected, your ISP colleagues who are in the xx-small
>> category (with a /22 of IPv4 or less) can would be able to
>> obtain a corresponding /40 of IPv6 (if the policy proposal
>> being discussed were adopted) and there would be no charge.
> 
> I very much agree and would be very happy to see that happen.  If it does, I would support a change to the policy proposal to move the minimum allocation to /40.

Excellent to hear, and my apologies for the confusion on this
topic resulting from the fee schedule snafu.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN