[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
bross at pobox.com
Thu Mar 28 07:51:45 EDT 2013
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, John Curran wrote:
> I believe that the "/48 or smaller" line on the pending fee
> schedule is incorrect and in the process of being fixed.
Now that makes all the difference in the world if that were to happen.
> The correct number in the series should read "/40 or less"
> Once corrected, your ISP colleagues who are in the xx-small
> category (with a /22 of IPv4 or less) can would be able to
> obtain a corresponding /40 of IPv6 (if the policy proposal
> being discussed were adopted) and there would be no charge.
I very much agree and would be very happy to see that happen. If it does,
I would support a change to the policy proposal to move the minimum
allocation to /40.
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
More information about the ARIN-PPML