[arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post ARIN run-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)

Steven Ryerse SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Wed Jun 12 13:09:57 EDT 2013


No I just meant companies their size could possibly justify a full /8 so applying a /12 max on everyone might not work if somebody big applied for something bigger than a /12.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Brandon Ross [mailto:bross at pobox.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:11 PM
To: Steven Ryerse
Cc: Mike Burns; William Herrin; ARIN PPML
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post ARIN run-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4)

On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Steven Ryerse wrote:

> Don't know if a /12 cap would work if a big guy like tmobile or 
> Microsoft applied for a larger allocation. It is fine for most 
> organizations though.

Huh?  Are you suggesting that Tmobile and Microsoft are incapable of completing the needs justification process??

-- 
Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:  2269442
Schedule a meeting:  https://doodle.com/bross            Skype:  brandonross



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list