[arin-ppml] Against 2013-4

[Owen DeLong]

On an additional note, Steven, ARIN does not change RFCs...That is done by the RFC-Editor and usually through the IETF process.

Owen

On Jun 4, 2013, at 15:34 , John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
> 
>> John, you are right but when high level RFC changes are contemplated maybe polling all of the organizations listed in the ARIN database for comments is the proper thing to do.  After all Legacy Holder allocations were made under those RFCs et al.
> 
> Steven -
>  
>      Polling any subset of the community runs a very real risk of bias in the resulting input,
>      and since affected parties are more than those who were issued resources, it is best 
>      if those with an interest in number resource policy make their view known.
> 
>      Note that many resource holders simply wish to use their IP number resources; i.e.
>      they requested and received their resources and wish to be unmolested but simply
>      use those resources in peace, and ARIN contacting all resource holders for each new
>      draft policy would quickly rise to the level of being perceived as "spam"...
> 
> Thanks,
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130604/a1fc6241/attachment.htm>