[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: Fair Distribution
jschiller at google.com
Fri Jul 12 17:26:32 EDT 2013
In that case can you be a little more explicit?
I have always felt like ISP have a different need than end-sites, and
understood the divergence
in policy for the two.
For example, and ISP should be forced to document when it makes an
assignment to a customer,
The same requirement doesn't apply to a University who is assigning space
to the philosophy department.
What differences between ISPs and end-sites do you think are unfair.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Jason Schiller <jschiller at google.com>
> >> > 0.2 Fair Distribution
> >> >
> >> > The principle of Fair Distribution is the precept that the
> >> > fundamental purpose of Internet number resources management is to
> >> > distributed unique number resources in a fair and impartial manner
> >> > to entities building and operating networks, for benefit of all
> >> > Internet users equally, and thereby facilitating the growth and
> >> > sustainability of the Internet.
> >> How does this statement square with the continued existence of two
> >> very unequal classes of registrants?
> > IMO, in the past, the community has agreed that those who got legacy
> > did so under a different set of rules.
> Hi Jason,
> To clarify, I meant ISPs and end users.
> Though the legacy issue does illustrate the difference between
> fairness and fair distribution. Grandfathering mechanisms are usually
> fair but rarely yield a fair distribution.
> Bill Herrin
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML