[arin-ppml] Thoughts on Conservation [was: Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised]
stephen at sprunk.org
Thu Jul 11 15:15:06 EDT 2013
On 11-Jul-13 13:32, Mike Burns wrote:
>> I have not seen anyone propose that we dismantle the existing
>> paradigm (save those who wish to drop needs assessments completely)
>> nor anyone proposing a new ongoing audit and revocation mechanism.
>> Let's stick to the facts and proposals that are on the table, I'm
>> passionately against the slaughter of unicorns but I doubt that's
>> relevant to this discussion...
> You are the one proposing change here.
> And even though there are not currently any proposals on the table to
> begin auditing and revokations, the placement of the conservation
> principle in the NRPM with the assertion that it covers all addresses
> will act to bolster any such pending proposal. That's why I am opposed
> to the proposal.
We already have a reclamation process; see NRPM 12 and the enabling
language in the RSA. ARIN hasn't used it much/any to date except in
cases of suspected fraud, which IMHO is a dereliction of its duty, but
it _has_ been used. Therefore, any proposal to "begin" using it would
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2381 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the ARIN-PPML