[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles - revised

[William Herrin]

You're right John. Bill, I apologize for calling you a smart ass.

The draft describes desirable states, not a belief system. Bill
defined the former as goals and the latter as principles. Bill then
cleverly and deliberately mischaracterized my comment that, if that's
so, the draft should be relabelled with the correct word: goals.

Clearly I was wrong to view Bill's 'ditching principles' response as a
smart-ass remark. And even if it was, it was unforgivably rude for me
to have said so.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Sweeting, John
<john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:
> Bill Herrin, you are totally out of line here. Please clean it up, there
> is no excuse for your rudeness below. Period.
>
> On 7/10/13 8:47 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Bill Darte <billdarte at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:55 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>>> Then perhaps we should ditch the word "principles" and stick with
>>>> "goals" like RFC 2050 did.
>>
>>> I think in this world, the ditching of principles has always proven to
>>>be a
>>> poor choice.



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004