[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Mon Apr 8 02:02:47 EDT 2013
Arin and this community could of course - rewrite the allocation polices like the RIPE proposal http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-03 and make it easier and more straightforward to "qualify" for IP resources. Then organizations that have been denied allocations (like ours) or organizations that haven't even bothered to apply to Arin for an allocation for fear of being denied - could then get resources and be added to the community that pays Arin fees.
Then maybe Arin's board of directors wouldn't/won't have to approve fee increases because there would be many more organizations paying fees and Arin's total revenue would increase.
Arin gets more revenue, Organizations get needed resources, Arin is fulfilling its Mission, Organizations get lower costs. Sounds like a win-win-win-win to me.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Paul Vixie
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:14 AM
To: Matthew Kaufman
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 4/7/2013 6:41 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> ... the ARIN fee schedule is based in no way on willingness to pay more.
> Willingness, ability, same thing. Since I started writing this reply,
> John has chimed in to note that if everyone paid the same it would
> need to be $2800/year. So ARIN has happily found a few ISPs that are
> willing to pay so much more than some others can pay as little as $500.
willingness and ability aren't the same thing, but that doesn't matter, because the fee schedule isn't based on either one.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML