[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
owen at delong.com
Mon Apr 8 01:11:10 EDT 2013
On Apr 7, 2013, at 18:10 , Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> Michael Sinatra wrote:
>> I don't like discussing the fee schedule on PPML any more than anyone
>> else, but as an operator, I am being asked to support an
>> operationally-suboptimal policy as a band-aid for this one issue in the
>> fee schedule, and that's what's giving me heartburn right now.
> are you aware of the other arin mailing list, limited to members unlike
> this public policy mailing list (PPML), where discussions of fees paid
> would be somewhat more targeted since it would be a discussion of
> fee-payers? this mailing list is documented here:
Unfortunately, that's not an entirely accurate characterization.
arin-discuss is only open to members to the best of my knowledge.
Many (if not most) of the entities paying fees to ARIN are not members.
In fact, I could not be on that list by virtue of my own resources. I happen
to be on there because I am a consultant to several members and an
employee of one.
More information about the ARIN-PPML