[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[John Curran]

On Apr 7, 2013, at 10:30 AM, "cb.list6" <cb.list6 at gmail.com<mailto:cb.list6 at gmail.com>> wrote:

Generally speaking we need to move away from conservation as goal for both ipv4 and ipv6

Structurally there is no need in v6 and the market will force it in v4

conservation at the rir level creates costly externalities in routing and other areas such as system design.

Ripe is on the right track http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-03

CB -

Could you be a little more specific with regards to whether you support
"Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs"?  It would
provide an option for ISPs who wish to be issued IPv6 allocations of
/40, which is smaller than present policy allows.  The referenced RIPE
policy proposal is with regards to IPv4 allocation policy, not IPv6, so
it is hard to discern whether you support allowing ISPs to request a
smaller allocation if they wish to.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130407/a07da1fc/attachment.htm>