[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[David Farmer]

On 4/5/13 10:58 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> How about "...expand the allocation to any nibble aligned size up to /32 without renumbering or additional..."
>
> Owen

OK, That was a helpful suggestion.  How about this;

g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to 
expand the allocation to any nibble aligned size up to /32 at any time 
without renumbering or additional justification. ...

> On Apr 5, 2013, at 06:45 , David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/13 08:31 , William Herrin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>>>> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
>>>> expand the allocation to /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or
>>>> additional justification.
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
>>> "either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."
>>
>> That's was bugging me too, but I wasn't sure how to fix it.  How about;
>>
>> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to expand the allocation to either /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or additional justification. ...
>>
>> Does that cover it without getting to wordy?
>>
>>>> e. All returned block(s) must not be in use by the organization or its
>>>> customers.
>>>
>>> This verbiage is a little clumsy. I'm not sure how to word it better.
>>
>> How about;
>>
>> e. All block(s) returned must not be in use by the organization or its customers.
>>
>> Not a big change but it read a little better.


-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================