[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
owen at delong.com
Fri Apr 5 11:58:22 EDT 2013
How about "...expand the allocation to any nibble aligned size up to /32 without renumbering or additional..."
On Apr 5, 2013, at 06:45 , David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> On 4/5/13 08:31 , William Herrin wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>>> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
>>> expand the allocation to /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or
>>> additional justification.
>> Hi David,
>> This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
>> "either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."
> That's was bugging me too, but I wasn't sure how to fix it. How about;
> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to expand the allocation to either /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or additional justification. ...
> Does that cover it without getting to wordy?
>>> e. All returned block(s) must not be in use by the organization or its
>> This verbiage is a little clumsy. I'm not sure how to word it better.
> How about;
> e. All block(s) returned must not be in use by the organization or its customers.
> Not a big change but it read a little better.
> David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML